A few details about Louisiana’s new law in posting the Ten Commandments in all K-12 classrooms:
The law provides a version of the Ten Commandments not found in any version of the Bible because the text’s translations and religions differ. The language comes from Van Order v. Perry (2006) case before the Supreme Court involving a monument on public land with text from the Fraternal Order of Eagles.
The first four commandments are specifically about religion and God with no reference to morality. The Sabbath can be on either Saturday or Sunday, depending on one’s religion.
The law has no resolution for funding if the school doesn’t receive sufficient donations because state funding cannot be used.
The law calls the Mayflower Compact “America’s First Written Constitution” and the “first purely American document of self-government.” With many references to God, the law recreates a U.S. government from a document for local governance of a few hundred religious extremists based on God and declaring that King James is the “sovereign lord.”
Claiming the historical use of “God” in U.S. law, the new law shows the only mention of God is the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, passed 11 years before the Constitution was ratified.
The law blocks schools from asking about students’ vaccination status and prohibiting Covid vaccination mandates.
Teachers can be sued for using a student’s preferred name or pronouns; any nicknames must be “derived” from the name on the birth certificate, according to the law.
With the “Let Kids Be Kids” provision, the law “protects” all students from any mention of sexual orientation, gender identity, or sexual orientation through grade 12. No teacher, coach, or other school employee can discuss these topics or reveal their own gender identity or sexual orientation—even if they are heterosexual.
Schools can appoint a “volunteer chaplain.”
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) complained that people don’t want the commandments posted don’t want their children to be taught that it’s bad to steal things. Her son faces 22 theft-related charges for breaking into cars and stealing credit cards. On Truth Social, Deposed Donald Trump (DDT) posted:
“I LOVE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PRIVATE SCHOOLS, AND MANY OTHER PLACES, FOR THAT MATTER. READ IT — HOW CAN WE, AS A NATION, GO WRONG???”
DDT has made himself an idol, taken “the name of the Lord thy God in vain,” does not keep the sabbath “holy,” commits adultery, steals, lies, and covets—Numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The jury is out on whether he honored his parents and kills, but he may have killed people when they lost their retirement funds from his cheating.
Louisiana also has a new law permitting surgical castration for those committing sex crimes against children, moving forward from its long-term permission of chemical castration. A question is whether the new law would apply to DDT’s “spiritual mentor,” Robert Morris, who has resigned from his pastorship after the discovery that he molested a 12-year-old girl. Or to Paul Pressler, alleged sexual predatory of young boys, who helped shape the Southern Baptist Church and was influential in Texas GOP control. Some of the boys were under 10, and Texas has a law permitting chemical castration. Pressler died in early June at the age of 93.
In a partial resolution for the Washington Post scandal regarding new leadership from Rupert Murdoch’s dynasty, new top editor Robert Winnett is departing. Winnett’s history includes stolen information including illegally obtaining and paying for information while working for British media. New CEO/publisher Lewis has many coverups in his background surrounding British royalty and former Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Failing to win his appeal to delay his prison stay until after the election, DDT’s adviser Steve Bannon has made a “hail Mary” attempt with the Supreme Court. He is scheduled to report to a low-security federal prison in Danbury (CT) on July 1 for contempt of Congress by refusing to appear before the House January 6 investigative committee or provide them requested documents. His four-month sentence will see him released a few days before the November election. His argument to the three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court is that the information on his podcast about the election is important to millions of people. Recently, he told a Detroit audience that if DDT wins the election, they will “purge” the DOJ and “take apart” the FBI.
DDT’s pet judge Aileen Cannon held a public hearing on Friday about dismissing the classified documents indictment about whether special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional. In February, DDT’s lawyers filed a motion that the appointments clause of the Constitution “does not permit the Attorney General to appoint, without Senate confirmation, a private citizen and like-minded political ally to wield the prosecutorial power of the United States. As such, Jack Smith lacks the authority to prosecute this action.”
In November 2022, AG Merrick Garland appointed Smith as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into DDT’s handling of classified documents after he was president plus his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. DDT’s lawyers want the special counsel categorized as a “principal officer,” subject to Senate confirmation, and cannot be authorized by the attorney general. Defense also argued that Smith’s investigation violates the appropriations clause of the Constitution, accusing President Joe Biden “is paying for this politically motivated prosecution of Biden’s chief political rival ‘off the books,’ without accountability or authorization.”
Cannon seemed skeptical of some arguments, including the defense accusation that the AG has been given “the power to appoint a shadow government,” with no oversight. Cannon asked for information she could have found on her own about the history of the use of special counsels, independent counsels, and special prosecutors.
Representing the special counsel’s office, James Pearce stated that the defense argument disregards precedent, has “pernicious consequences,” and was already resolved in U.S. v. Nixon (1974), in which the Supreme Court found that then-President Richard Nixon must release audio records and other evidence related to Watergate. Justices found that the AG had authority to appoint special counsel who could independently investigate. Pearce also gave historical perspective back to special counsels during presidencies of Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt. Cannon asked Pearce if the AG had oversight in seeking the indictment; he cited policy in declining to answer. She pressed him, and he continued to decline. At the end of today’s events, she asked prosecutors and defense to file any supplemental materials with a maximum of five pages.
Three outside parties that had filed briefs also presented arguments in court on Friday.
After a report that Cannon is protecting DDT, his former lawyer Ty Cobb said that “the law requires that she validate Jack Smith’s appointment, and not disqualify him.” He explained that in 1988 “the Independent Counsel statute, which preceded special counsel appointments … was fully vetted in the Supreme Court and upheld.” He added if she rules for DDT that the ruling would go to the 11th Circuit Court and “this petty, partisan prima donna would be put in her place, and they would remove her.” He added that her actions go “way beyond” just being inexperienced. “The reality is, she is slow. And she’s slow on purpose,” he added.
One Supreme Court ruling announcement on Friday:
U.S. v. Rahimi: Eight justices exhibited common sense in supporting a federal law that a person demonstrating a threat to safety of other people loses the right to legally own firearms, overturning a 5th Circuit Court decision. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented with his belief that everyone has the right to own guns, no matter how dangerous they are because the Founding Fathers didn’t put restrictions on the Second Amendment. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pointed out that the 18th-century document didn’t protect women from domestic violence, rape, and sexual assault by their partners, but Thomas responded by stating that “not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue.”
Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion stated that the law cannot be “trapped in amber. The ruling seems to back off from the earlier “originalist” decisions in D.C. v. Heller giving people the right to possess any kind of firearm with the excuse of self-defense and N.Y. ... v. Bruen, giving the right to take these guns into the public and requiring historical precedents for decisions.
When Thomas authored Bruen’s decision, he added that restrictions on ownership must have a parallel in American history. Rahimi expands “historical sources” to include not statutes and regulations but also commonly followed legal practices such as the Founding era’s stopping individuals who threaten harm to others from using a firearm. The ruling is still ambiguous, using only the term “dangerous people,” but it’s a start. As former Alabama federal AG Joyce Vance wrote:
“The truth is this: the Founding Fathers would not have wanted the country to live like this. Their muskets weren’t so sacred to them that they would have sacrificed our children to them. They didn’t pass the Second Amendment so parents could get shot in our streets on the 4th of July. The Second Amendment’s well-regulated militia wasn’t supposed to be shooting at us!”
The high court also returned a case to Arizona’s state court. Convicted of drug possession, Jason Smith opposed the finding because the expert witness who testified for the prosecution about drug analysis didn’t perform the tests.
The court still has 16 rulings to announce and doesn’t plan any more announcements until June 26. Friday’s “good news” decision may lead into the bombshell that Deposed Donald Trump (DDT) has “absolute immunity” for all crimes.