Judge Aileen Cannon isn’t giving Deposed Donald Trump (DDT) the SCIF he wants at Mar-a-Lago; he wants to can stay home to look through classified documents. DDT asked for a sensitive compartment information facility (SCIF) at his Palm Beach estate. Her 16-page protective order conforms with general practices of federal courts by noting that DDT’s lawyers don’t have full security clearances yet. Cannon also ordered the appointment of a classified information security officer, responsible for ensuring lawyers have access to national security information and handle it carefully. She didn’t specify where the SCIF would be, but they are typically in or near federal courthouses. Prosecutors can ask that some audiences be kept off-limits to the documents. Access to classified information is more restricted to DDT’s co-defendants in the case, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. Specific court orders will be required for sharing classified information with Nauta.
Fulton County (GA) Judge Scott McAfee determined that DA Fani Willis’ 19 RICO codefendants do not have to participate in the same trial: Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell will be tried on October 23, and the others can wait. McAfee didn’t give a trial date for DDT and his other 16 co-defendants. Chesebro’s attorneys also want to question grand jury members who approved the indictments, questioning the legitimacy of their actions. An assistant Fulton County district attorney disagreed, maintaining that attorneys cannot question grand jurors about their deliberations. McAfee has not ruled on the request, indicating that the jurors would have to be willing and pointing out the threats and doxing for many of them after the indictments.
In a harbinger of things to come, reporters stated that “tensions ran high” during this week’s hearing, complete with “snide comments,” raised voices, and “accusations” from both sides. One defense attorney said he should be permitted to continue his argument because the hearing was being “broadcast live.” Powell’s attorney wants prosecutors’ arguments in writing so that he can preview them before coming to court.
Chesebro’s attorney accused the assistant DA of having “lied to the court” about existing case law regarding his right to talk with grand jurors. McAfee asked him to stop his heated response, but the defense attorney’s justification was that the proceedings are being “broadcast live.” Legal expert Lisa Rubin said the attorneys were inappropriate in requesting to question grand jurors. She said that the defense attorneys had neither the facts nor the law on their side so they threaten “the DA’s team with prosecutorial conduct.”
McAfee also shut down the defense attorney’s arguments after he accused the assistant DA of firing “personal attacks” and “[impugning] the reputation” of his colleague. The attorney also complained that the state’s presentation of a PowerPoint was “not an efficient use of the court’s time.” McAfee said that his complaint “is not part of the record right now” because “this is not part of the consideration, and if you want to handle that outside of [court] we will do that.”
Chesebro also wants transcripts to be unsealed from the first special grand jury that recommended charges but did not vote on the indictments. McAfee said he will hold weekly hearings to deal with Chesebro’s and Powell’s motions so that they don’t build up.
The 11th Circuit Court will consider an appeal from former chief of staff Mark Meadows after Judge Steve Jones turned down his request to move his RICO charges from Fulton County (GA) to a federal court. Oral arguments are scheduled Friday if the court determines they are “warranted.” Meadows withdrew his request for an emergency stay because the court promised to expedite its ruling. Meadows is indicted for participating in eight “overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy”; his attorney stated “nothing Mr. Meadows is alleged in the indictment to have done is criminal.”
For the second time, anti-immigrant federal Judge Andrew Hanen in Texas ruled the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program unlawful but didn’t terminate deportation protections and work permits for 580,000 immigrant “Dreamers.” Last year, the 5th Circuit Court also declared DACA illegal, and the case may go to the Supreme Court. By the end of March, 578,680 immigrants, who illegally came to the U.S. as children, live in the U.S.—over half of them in California, Texas, Illinois, and New York—because they meet the requirements of the executive order. DDT tried to terminate the 2011 law in 2017, but the policy has been moving through the courts. A appeal will go to the highly conservative 5th Circuit Court.
In a case about removing DDT’s name from the state election from 14th Amendment language, a federal judge in Colorado dismissed DDT ’s attempt to move the case to a federal court and declare voters bringing the case lacked standing. Judge Philip Bremmer, appointed by George W. Bush, called the case “defective” because Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, also named in the lawsuit, didn’t want to move the case from state court. A similar lawsuit was filed in Minnesota’s state court this week by registered voters.
New Hampshire’s GOP Secretary of State David Scanlon has stated that he has no legal basis to disqualify DDT or any other candidate as it relates to the 14th Amendment. His announcement came the day after DDT’s campaign sent him a letter signed by dozens of GOP state lawmakers urging him to refuse the quest to disqualify DDT.
In a case about the House Freedom Caucus leader, Scott Perry (PA), the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that his communications with lawmakers to overturn the 2020 election are off-limits to special counsel Jack Smith. The three-judge panel, two of them appointed by DDT and third by George H.W. Bush, ordered a judge to individually review almost 2,000 documents with a stricter standard. Perry tried to help DDT replace the DOJ AG after the 2020 election with Jeffrey Clark who would get the agency to reverse its finding that President Joe Biden had been fairly elected.
On the seventh day, the Texas House rested its impeachment case against suspended state AG Ken Paxton after failing to call a star witness and fighting with defense attorneys about allegations that real estate developer bribed Paxton. House lawyer Rusty Hardin also realized that he made his announcement for resting the case too soon, cutting off further questioning of the current witness by either side. The defense attorney motioned for a directed verdict, requesting a dismissal of the articles of impeachment from lack of evidence, causing more problems. Jurors met behind closed doors for 45 minutes; when they returned, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, acting as judge, told them the defense had withdrawn its motion.
Laura Olson, Paxton’s mistress, also backed down from testifying after agreeing she would be a witness because she hadn’t received a 24-hour notice. When they returned, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, acting as judge, told them the defense had withdrawn its motion. By late afternoon, Olson was eligible to testify, but both sides agreed she could leave without taking the stand. She had been planning to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Instead, prosecutors called Drew Wicker, Paxton’s personal assistant. Both sides will give closing arguments on Friday before the jury determines a verdict.
Throughout the trial, defense lawyers attacked the witnesses for their disloyalty toward their employer and lack of documentation for the FBI when they reported Paxton. All the witnesses described how they told Paxton that he was creating problems for himself through excessive favors for Nate Paul, the real estate developer.
Paxton must still stand trial for state securities fraud charges dating to 2015. Although he has pled guilty to that case, his lawyers said a successful impeachment might encourage him to a plea agreement. The FBI, investigating Paxton since 2020, may be “monitoring” the trial for the testimony of eight whistleblowers about Paxton’s alleged crimes. It could lead to a federal indictment.
Paxton’s wife, a senator, sat through the proceedings including the recent testimony of Paxton’s infidelity, part of the catalyst for his other crimes. She won’t be able to vote, but she must be present to increase the number of votes to impeach him. In essence, her presence creates a “no” vote.
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is facing a lawsuit for withholding information about her travel at the same time she’s trying to change the state’s public records law. To remove transparency, the law would make information about travel for the governor and other “constitutional officers” exempt from the law—and be retroactive to before Sanders took office.
The law would also block release of records “reflecting communications” between the governor’s office and her Cabinet secretaries, after a previous version more broadly blocked the release of state agencies’ “deliberative process.” Even Republicans in the state question GOP lawmakers’ support for the law, and the former state police director, who served under Mike Huckabee—Sanders’ father—condemned a retroactive change, stating it shows admission of wrongdoing.
Google is facing a DOJ trial about its policies and deals with other industry companies, accusing Google of an illegal monopoly in the search market that harms innovation. Questions:
- Are Google’s deals with Apple and other providers exclusive?
- Does Google limit online ad competition through search?
- Is Google’s dominance limiting search innovation?
- Who counts as Google’s competitors in search?
- Who is expected to testify?
And the biggest case for the day—the felony indictment of Hunter Biden, the president’s son, for lying when he bought a gun in 2018 which he kept for 11 days. But that’s a much longer story.