In January 2020, when Deposed Donald Trump (DDT) was in the White House, an Iranian missile gave dozens of U.S. military members brain injuries that he called “headaches.” Now DDT is blaming President Joe Biden for the drone attack killing three soldiers and wounding another 40—accusing Biden as being weak and claiming that an “attack would NEVER have happened if I was President, not even a chance.” He added that his control would mean “no more chaos, no more destruction ….”
DDT still criticizes Biden for a disastrous economy but also takes credit for both Biden’s good economy and the skyrocketing stock market. “THIS IS THE TRUMP STOCK MARKET,” DDT recently posted on Truth Social. Bad—blame Biden; good—DDT did it.
More GOP congressional members voting against assistance for their constituents are taking credit for huge infrastructure projects, one of them Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN) who said he was “proud to help deliver … the federal funds.” Stauber lambasted Biden and Democratic Gov. Tim Walz because they didn’t understand the legislative process. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg explained to Stauber that the $1 billion replacement of the Blatnik Bridge “is happening because the Biden infrastructure package passed, despite your ‘no’ vote.” The Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party added that Stauber called the bridge replacement “a path to socialism.”
In Florida, GOP Rep. Maria Elivira Salazar proudly presented a $650,000 check to help small businesses at Florida International University. A reporter asked her why she took credit after voting against the bill providing the funds, and Salazar said she brings money to her constituents every time she has the opportunity. Further pressed about her votes, Salazar said she couldn’t remember how she votes on any bills and she would ask her staff to check. In a 2022 video, she lied about inflation being 40 percent when it was 8.3 percent and blamed “Washington.”
Conservatives want everyone to know that the situation at the southern border is a disaster, but they don’t want to take any action on it for at least another year, hoping that DDT will move back into the White House. Speaker MAGA Mike Johnson (R-LA) has the choice between alienating his far-right caucus by presenting a Senate bill to the House or alienating potential voters for GOP candidates by postponing the border problem for over a year. He has said he won’t present the bill although he hasn’t seen it.
Johnson maintains that Biden could solve the border problem with executive actions, but Biden stated he needs funds and congressional authority that he has requested for several months. The president has already issued over 500 immigration-related executive actions, far more than DDT did, but hasn’t revived DDT’s policies because courts found 90 percent of them illegal. Another one that Johnson wants to revive, “Remain in Mexico,” is still in the courts, but it never blocked unlawful border crossing while exposing migrants to rape, kidnapping, torture, and other danger. Mexico has stated it would not cooperate with the program. Johnson’s demand for building the wall lacks congressional funding.
Following DDT’s order to reject any bipartisan bill to make the border secure, Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) accused Biden and his administration of “traitorous acts,” “slave trade,” “sex trafficking,” and promotion of “endless rapes” of women and children.
“The Army of God,” a truck envoy leaving Virginia Beach to “Take Our Border Back,” promised it would have 700,000 participants but has only a few dozen. Conspiracy theories, “fedsurrection,” on Telegram channels posted fears that the purpose was to catch right-wingers in violence similar to the belief about January 6, 2021 by one-fourth of people in the nation.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who brags about her patriotism, has a solution for the border problem: dissolve the United States and let the GOP states secede.
A government shutdown is 14 working days away, and Johnson is leading his House conservatives in an evidence-free impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The Homeland Security Committee, led by Mark Green (R-TN) debated the impeachment articles past midnight on January 31. The Constitution states that Impeachments are only for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The two articles of the impeachment resolution accuse Mayorkas of violating immigration laws through Biden administration policies and accusing him of not following his duties, misleading Congress, and obstructing their investigation. Republicans complained about too many migrants coming across the border, the large amount of fentanyl collected at the crossings, and a parole program for Ukrainians.
Republicans claim that the Founding Fathers interpreted impeachment that the current GOP is, that instead of a criminal offense, demeanor means demeaning oneself. Therefore they can impeachment someone for not following the law or abusing their authority and said Mayorkas lied to Congress by stating that the border is operationally secure. The standard of “secure” in the Secure Fence Act is that not one person or piece of contraband improperly crosses the border. Mayorkas said that the law must be viewed with a “layer of reasonableness.” He clearly stated that he wasn’t using the Secure Fence Act definition.
Johnson endorsed the impeachment and promised a vote on the House floor after the Homeland Security Committee advances the articles. His letter to Republicans falsely stated that Biden doesn’t need a law to create border security and that Biden wouldn’t enforce immigration laws anyway. Constitutional experts from right, left, and center have lambasted the impeachment project because in this case it doesn’t fit the U.S. system of government. Jonathan Turley, usually on the side of GOP congressional members, disagrees with the impeachment proposal:
“The courts have long recognized that presidents are allowed to establish priorities in the enforcement of federal laws, even when those priorities tend to lower enforcement for certain groups or areas. It is a matter of discretion.
“Voters will soon have an opportunity to render a judgment on those policies in the election. Mayorkas has carried out those policies. What has not been shown is conduct by the secretary that could be viewed as criminal or impeachable.”
One accusation against Mayorkas was that he refused to respond to requests. In one of the many demands that he appear before the committee, Mayorkas offered to testify but was unavailable for the hearing date because he was hosting a Mexican delegation. Mayorkas has testified before Congress more than any other Biden-appointed Cabinet official.
Since the GOP took over Congress a year ago, DHS turned over 20,000 pages of documents, 13,000 to just the Homeland Security Committee. Of the committee’s 173 requests, some are in process, such as the subpoena demanding information related to the Afghanistan withdrawal. Other requests were duplicate items already provided to the committee. DHS is putting together over one million pages of documents for a request, already having sent 6,500 pages of documents before the committee sent a subpoena for “failure to provide satisfactory documents,” complaining some were redacted or illegible. Many requests gave a two-week deadline and “delinquent” for only a few days.
Democrats pointed out that Mayorkas has been far more responsive than DDT, who routinely ignored congressional requests and subpoenas with no action from Republicans. DDT-era officials refused to appear for the annual worldwide threats hearing during the last two years of the administration. Then-DHS leader Chad Wolfe defied a subpoena after the department provided no documents to a border security request. In the past month, Mayorkas appeared before the committee twice, a budget hearing and the annual worldwide threats hearing.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) stated:
“Republicans don’t actually want to work towards bipartisan solutions to fix the border—in fact, they have repeatedly sabotaged the Secretary’s efforts to secure the border and denied DHS’ funding requests. Secretary Mayorkas is upholding the law and honoring the public trust as he has throughout his more than 30 years of service to our Nation. The House must reject this sham resolution.”
A Cabinet member has not been impeached for 148 years when Secretary of War William Belknap was impeached in 1876 over alleged bribes. The Senate acquitted him. Some GOP senators have warned House members that any impeachment of Mayorkas would have a bipartisan death in their chamber. Those senators indicated that they don’t want to waste their time on the meaningless impeachment in the House where about a dozen names have been floated for the same meaningless action.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) suggested that most House Republicans would prefer not to be forced to vote on impeachments for Mayorkas and Biden. About the impeachments, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) said about the House that “so far they’ve got nothing.” Several GOP senators believe policy issues are a bigger priority than the impeachments. Sens. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and John Hoeven (R-ND) want to focus on passing appropriations. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), however, accused Mayorkas of “deliberately defying federal law.”
Unfortunately for senators, the chamber is required to hold a trial on all impeachment articles passed by the House and meet six days a week unless the majority changes that schedule. No legislative or executive business can occur while the chamber is “sitting as a Court of Impeachment.” Political trials could also keep senators from campaigning between now and November.
After a lengthy, contentious hearing, the committee voted 18-15 on party lines to advance the impeachment articles to the House floor.